In-Depth AI Detector WriteHuman Review: Does It Really Work?

Being a professional content writer, I have always been on the lookout for the best humanizing tools. I have reviewed a plethora of them, such as Zerogpt, Hix bypass and stealthwriter, to help you make an informed decision by weighing the pros, cons, and test results. So, here I am back again with another exclusive humanizing tool review, i.e., WriteHuman.

In this WriteHuman review, we will analyze if this tool is worth using, whether it is capable of identifying low-quality AI content and rewriting it, and to what extent its results are reliable.

What is WriteHuman?

Developed by Ivan Jackson in 2024, WriteHuman is an online-based AI text humanizer. It relies on the innovative Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to rewrite the AI-generated text and make it undetectable by renowned AI detectors, say WriteHuman.

Key Features of WriteHuman AI Humanizer

Here are some exclusive features of WriteHuman AI Humanizer that you should know:

• Features a simple and user-friendly interface.
• Provides reliable Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology for smoother and more authentic text.
• Makes AI-generated content indistinguishable from human writing.
• Includes a built-in WriteHuman AI detector tool to check for AI-generated content.
• Offers free requests per month.

How to Use WriteHuman?

Here is how you can use these platforms for effectively rewriting AI-generated text and bypass AI-detection tools:

• Copy the AI-generated text and paste it into the WriteHuman tool on their website.

• Click the "Write Human" button to transform the AI-generated text into human-like writing.

• Review the output and if your are not satisfied with it, you can try to use their Enhanced Model. You can also use the built-in AI detector to ensure the text won't be flagged as AI-generated if needed.

Final Verdict about WriterHuman Tool

WriteHuman is a solid AI humanizer, excelling in bypassing detectors like ZeroGPT, GPTZero, and CopyLeaks with its NLP-based technology. Its simple interface and built-in AI detector make it accessible for refining AI content without heavy rewriting.

However, the tool has limitations in readability, often producing humanized text with a low score of 36, requiring additional edits to reach ideal clarity. While WriteHuman is reliable for basic humanization, users needing high readability and faster processing may benefit from exploring alternative options.

Top alternative to WriteHuman: Tenorshare AI Bypass

While WriteHuman effectively humanizes AI content and bypasses many detectors, it has limitations in readability and processing speed. Despite good detection scores, WriteHuman’s humanized text often needs extra editing to reach an ideal readability score, which can be time-consuming for content creators.

In contrast, Tenorshare AI Bypass provides a smoother, more natural language flow with higher readability, making content publication-ready without extensive edits. Known for consistent quality and faster processing, it reliably bypasses top AI detectors like ZeroGPT, GPTZero, and CopyLeaks, making it a strong choice for those seeking efficient, high-quality humanization.

• Uses advanced algorithms to make AI-generated text feel natural and fully human, easily bypassing tools like ZeroGPT and GPTZero.
• Delivers high readability, so content flows smoothly without needing extra editing.
• Produces grammatically sound text with minimal corrections, boosting overall quality.
• Runs reliably with fast processing, perfect for users on tight deadlines.
• Offers responsive customer support to ensure a seamless experience.

Honest WriteHuman AI Review: Can It Bypass Major AI Detectors?

By now, you have gained basic knowledge about the tool, so let's move towards testing it. WriteHuman claims to be the world's most reliable and robust AI Humanizer with the punch line: "Elevate AI to Human Perfection." But is it truly worth it? Let's find out!

Generated Content from ChatGPT

First, we will use the latest GPT version to create a 100% AI-generated article. The topic can be of your choice; we went with the current stock market situation.

Let's now humanize it with WriteHuman!

We received content with a 97.82% human score according to its built-in AI detector, which is pretty impressive. But let's check with it with AI-detection tools now and verify if they are still able to recognize text as AI-generated. While

The result shows while WriteHuman's built-in AI detector gave a high human score, some external tools, like ZeroGPT, still detected AI-generated portions. Others, like CopyLeaks and GPTZero, showed minimal to no detection. This suggests that WriteHuman effectively reduces AI detectability, but results can vary depending on the detection tool used.

Test with ZeroGPT

As seen in the screenshot, it declares the text to be human-written, with 25.69% of text highlighted to be most probably AI-generated.

Test with GPTZero

We received impressive results this time, with only 3% AI detection.

Test with CopyLeaks

CopyLeaks has also detected the text as written by humans, as shown in the screenshot.

Test with Writer

Here is the result from Writer with 96% human-generated content.

What is the Quality of the Output Content?

The above results focused only on AI detection. In this section, we will check the humanized content for grammatical errors and assess its readability.

Grammarly Report

The humanized text shows a 95/100 score on Grammarly with only 5 Review suggestions based on missed commas. This is another indication that they transform the content into human like successfully, as humans mostly miss such punctuation marks during writing.

However, the readability is quite low. Only 36, where the suggested readability is 60 or above is needed for the article to be understood by grade 8th students. So, when it comes to the quality of content, though it's grammatically correct, its readability is a red flag that won't let the article rank on Google.

What's the Price of It? Is WriteHuman Free?

WriteHuman offers three free requests per month. After using them, you will have to purchase any of its plans for further usage. In general, it has three payment plans with the following details:

The basic plan is the most economical one and is the best bet for users with minimal paraphrasing needs. With it, they can send 40 requests per month with 600 words each.

The pro plan is ideal for regular users, as it comes with 100 requests per month, each with a 1200-word limit. Any professional or content creator can benefit from it.

Lastly, the Ultra plan is for businesses or high-end users. With it, they can send unlimited requests per month, each with a word count limit of 3000.

Pros and Cons of WriteHuman

Let's now summarize the review with key pros and cons.

Pros

• Consistent Results: As shown in the results above, WriteHuman offers consistent humanized results on all platforms.
• Grammatically Correct: The humanized content is almost grammatically correct, with minimal suggestions for punctuation.
• User-friendly Interface: Unlike other humanizing tools, WriteHuman offers a user-friendly and tidy interface with no clutter of ads.

Cons

• Readability Issue: Humanized content had reduced readability of just 36 that's much lower than the recommended score of 60 or above.
• Processing Time: Compared to the WriteHuman alternatives, WriteHuman takes a bit more time to process the content and come with humanized results.

Final Words

WriteHuman is an innovative platform that claims to be the world's best humanizing tool. While it successfully bypasses many AI detection tools with its NLP technology, the quality of its humanized content could be improved. With a readability score of 36—significantly below the recommended 60—it often requires additional editing to ensure clarity and engagement for readers.

For a more polished, high-readability alternative, Tenorshare AI Humanzier offers seamless humanization that maintains both quality and flow, saving you time on edits and enhancing the natural feel of your content.