In-Depth AI Detector WriteHuman Review: Does It Really Work?
Being a professional content writer, I have always been on the lookout for the best humanizing tools. I have reviewed a plethora of them, such as Zerogpt, Hix bypass and stealthwriter, to help you make an informed decision by weighing the pros, cons, and test results. So, here I am back again with another exclusive humanizing tool review, i.e., WriteHuman.
In this WriteHuman review, we will analyze if this tool is worth using, whether it is capable of identifying low-quality AI content and rewriting it, and to what extent its results are reliable.
What is WriteHuman?
Developed by Ivan Jackson in 2024, WriteHuman is an online-based AI text humanizer. It relies on the innovative Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to rewrite the AI-generated text and make it undetectable by renowned AI detectors, say WriteHuman.
Key Features of WriteHuman AI Humanizer
Here are some exclusive features of WriteHuman AI Humanizer that you should know:
- Features a simple and user-friendly interface.
- Provides reliable Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology for smoother and more authentic text.
- Makes AI-generated content indistinguishable from human writing.
- Includes a built-in WriteHuman AI detector tool to check for AI-generated content.
- Offers free requests per month.
How to Use WriteHuman?
Here is how you can use these platforms for effectively rewriting AI-generated text and bypass AI-detection tools:
-
Copy the AI-generated text and paste it into the WriteHuman tool on their website.
-
Click the "Write Human" button to transform the AI-generated text into human-like writing.
-
Review the output and if your are not satisfied with it, you can try to use their Enhanced Model. You can also use the built-in AI detector to ensure the text won't be flagged as AI-generated if needed.
Honest WriteHuman AI Review: Can It Bypass Major AI Detectors?
By now, you have gained basic knowledge about the tool, so let's move towards testing it. WriteHuman claims to be the world's most reliable and robust AI Humanizer with the punch line: "Elevate AI to Human Perfection." But is it truly worth it? Let's find out!
Generated Content from ChatGPT
First, we will use the latest GPT version to create a 100% AI-generated article. The topic can be of your choice; we went with the current stock market situation.
Let's now humanize it with WriteHuman!
We received content with a 97.82% human score according to its built-in AI detector, which is pretty impressive. But let's check with it with AI-detection tools now and verify if they are still able to recognize text as AI-generated. While
The result shows while WriteHuman's built-in AI detector gave a high human score, some external tools, like ZeroGPT, still detected AI-generated portions. Others, like CopyLeaks and GPTZero, showed minimal to no detection. This suggests that WriteHuman effectively reduces AI detectability, but results can vary depending on the detection tool used.
Tools | AI Score After WriteHuman Humanized |
---|---|
ZeroGPT | 25.69% |
GPT Zero | 3% |
CopyLeaks | 0% |
Writer | 4% |
Test with ZeroGPT
As seen in the screenshot, it declares the text to be human-written, with 25.69% of text highlighted to be most probably AI-generated.
Test with GPTZero
We received impressive results this time, with only 3% AI detection.
Test with CopyLeaks
CopyLeaks has also detected the text as written by humans, as shown in the screenshot.
Test with Writer
Here is the result from Writer with 96% human-generated content.
What is the Quality of the Output Content?
The above results focused only on AI detection. In this section, we will check the humanized content for grammatical errors and assess its readability.
Grammarly Report
The humanized text shows a 95/100 score on Grammarly with only 5 Review suggestions based on missed commas. This is another indication that they transform the content into human like successfully, as humans mostly miss such punctuation marks during writing.
However, the readability is quite low. Only 36, where the suggested readability is 60 or above is needed for the article to be understood by grade 8th students. So, when it comes to the quality of content, though it's grammatically correct, its readability is a red flag that won't let the article rank on Google.
What's the Price of It? Is WriteHuman Free?
WriteHuman offers three free requests per month. After using them, you will have to purchase any of its plans for further usage. In general, it has three payment plans with the following details:
Pricing Plan | Cost |
---|---|
Basic | $8 |
Pro | $14 |
Ultra | $32 |
The basic plan is the most economical one and is the best bet for users with minimal paraphrasing needs. With it, they can send 40 requests per month with 600 words each.
The pro plan is ideal for regular users, as it comes with 100 requests per month, each with a 1200-word limit. Any professional or content creator can benefit from it.
Lastly, the Ultra plan is for businesses or high-end users. With it, they can send unlimited requests per month, each with a word count limit of 3000.
Pros and Cons of WriteHuman
Let's now summarize the review with key pros and cons.
Pros
- Consistent Results: As shown in the results above, WriteHuman offers consistent humanized results on all platforms.
- Grammatically Correct: The humanized content is almost grammatically correct, with minimal suggestions for punctuation.
- User-friendly Interface: Unlike other humanizing tools, WriteHuman offers a user-friendly and tidy interface with no clutter of ads.
Cons
- Readability Issue: Humanized content had reduced readability of just 36 that's much lower than the recommended score of 60 or above.
- Processing Time: Compared to the WriteHuman alternatives, WriteHuman takes a bit more time to process the content and come with humanized results.
Final Words
WriteHuman is an innovative platform that claims to be the world's best humanizing tool. Though it bypassed renowned AI-detection tools relying on NLP, the humanized content quality was not that impressive.
It had a readability score of 36, which is much lower than the recommended score of 60. So, if you want to use this platform, be sure to invest in your editing skills to make the content more readable for your audience.
You Might Also Like
- GPTZero AI Content Detector Review 2024: Is GPTZero Reliable & Accurate?
- Stealthwriter Full Reviews 2024: How Effective is It?
- In-Depth Review of Content At Scale AI Detector: Accuracy, Reliability, and User Insights
- Hix Bypass Full Review 2024: Is it Trustworthy?
- Gptinf Humanizer Full Review 2024: You Need to Know
- Zerogpt Full Review 2024: Is Zerogpt Accurate & Reliable?
- Scribbr AI Detector Review 2024: How Accurate Is It?
- Comprehensive Guide to Crossplag AI Content Detector: Features, Accuracy, and User Reviews
- Detailed Review of Sapling AI Detector: Accuracy, Features, and Free Options
- Comprehensive Review of Winston AI Detector: Accuracy, Features, and Free Options
- Smodin AI Detector Review : How Accurate Is It?